Something about tick paralysis. Babesiasis
Posted by admin on May 2nd, 2009
I wanted to mention something about tick paralysis. Again, there can be a very dramatic recovery from what appears to catastrophic illness. Tick paralysis is due to a neurotoxin that is produced in the saliva of a tick. Symptoms can occur within two to seven days of exposure. Most cases from the United States have been reported from the Pacific Northwest, but they can occur anywhere in the United States. The typical mimic here is Guillain-Barre. This is someone who presents with a symmetric ascending paralysis, or weakness, with a suggestion of the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre. However, there is either something unusual about the presentation, like you can’t find an antecedent illness, or they are just in an area where they could be outdoors and have exposure. You should look for ticks and most commonly they are found in the scalp. If you remove the tick, the paralysis will respond. It doesn’t happen right away – it can take hours or even two or three days – for full recovery to occur. Full recovery usually occurs. Once every three or four years we see a case in an intensive care unit where it is presumed Guillain-Barre and if you look, you can find the tick. Again, the recovery in these cases is dramatic, whereas it is not with other causes or with primary Guillain-Barre. This is rare, but if you see it and recognize it, you can make a big impact.
When you remove a tick, you want to do it with as least trauma as possible. In general, if you are doing it carefully, tweezers can work fine. There are people who do all kinds of stuff, including Vaseline and other things. In general, the organizations that make recommendations about removing ticks say to do it with tweezers, but you want to try to remove the whole body of the tick; that is the problem. You can do this with fine forceps.
Treatment of the bite site does not decrease the risk of infection, but you can get superinfection of a tick bite, so applying something like topical mupirocin Bactroban online is generally recommended only if there is evidence of infection at the time that you see it. So if you are seeing a bite and there is purulence there, and it does happen, then it would be reasonable to treat topically. Otherwise, there is no evidence that treating topically makes a difference.
In terms of who should be vaccinated for Lyme disease, I think you need to assess who is at risk for the disease. Just living in an endemic area is probably not an indication. Living in an endemic area and spending a lot of time outdoors may well be an indication. Someone who works for a state forestry division in a state where Lyme is endemic should be considered. The thing that you always have to remember is that this is not a tremendous vaccine. So even if you vaccinate people, they still need to wear protective clothing and use repellents, so you are not making it so much easier for them. You are decreasing the risk of developing disease if they get bitten, but it doesn’t mean they can avoid doing all the other things. So I think you have to risk assess and see who is doing things outdoors.