Diagnosis tests for food hypersensivity
Posted by Health articles on June 15th, 2009
The evaluation for adverse food reactions begins by attempting to define whether the patient is suffering from a nonimmunologic intolerance or from an immune reaction, which can be IgE- or nonIgE-mediated. The following must be established if possible:
1) the identity and quantity of the food allergen suspected of provoking the reaction, 2) the time elapsed between the ingestion of the suspected food and the onset of symptoms, 3) a complete description of the symptoms elicited and the duration of the reactions, 4) whether similar symptoms have occurred in the past when the food was eaten and the therapeutic measures taken, and 5) whether other factors (eg, exercise) appear,necessary for symptoms to develop. Diet diaries sometimes are useful for the infant as an adjunct to the history; however, with the frequent use of processed foods and prepackaged meals, this may be difficult in the older child and adolescent. Parents are asked to keep a chronologic record of symptoms and foods ingested, generally for no longer than a week. The diary then is reviewed to correlate ingestion of specific food with the development of symptoms.
An elimination diet can be used as a diagnostic and therapeutic test when the history suggests that certain foods may be provoking the specific symptoms. Foods and all “hidden” sources of those foods suspected of inducing symptoms are eliminated from the patient’s diet for 1 to 2 weeks. In chronic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis or chronic diarrhea), additional factors may be contributing to symptoms.
Therefore, failure to resolve symptoms during the elimination period does not completely rule out a food hypersensitivity.
In cases in which food hypersensitivity or intolerance is suspected but no specific foods can be incriminated, a brief trial (ie, 2 to 4 weeks) of an oligoantigenic or elemental diet may be helpful. If symptoms persist unabated during that period, it is very unlikely that food is a contributing factor. If symptoms appear to improve, further characterization of the sensitivity may be pursued by allergy skin tests or serum IgE antibody tests. These should be performed prior to initiating the elimination diet because the presence or absence of food allergen-specific IgE antibodies is useful for counseling patients. When compared with the double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge (described below), prick skin tests have been found to have excellent negative predictive accuracies for IgE-mediated food allergy but poor positive predictive accuracies.
The major problem with skin testing for foods as well as with many serum IgE antibody tests for foods has been the lack of potent, stable, and pure standardized allergen solutions. At times, a few food allergens produce false-positive reactions secondary to an irritating effect on the skin. The results of food skin tests must be interpreted carefully because there may be a discrepancy between the production of clinical symptoms and positive skin tests to foods.
